Movie Review: Casino Royale
By Dennis West
Vesper Lynd: It doesn't bother you; killing all those people?
James Bond: Well I wouldn't be very good at my job if it did.
When a friend suggested going to see the new James Bond film, Casino RoyaleI’m sure that most of my reasons for not being crazy about previous Bond movies are the same things that would make people love them—the miraculous coincidences of his gadgets, the sexual puns and innuendo, his almost super-human ability to remain cool-headed amidst impending doom—instead, these gave me the attitude that if I’d seen one, I’ve seen them all.
But much to my surprise, once the opening credits began I knew that there was something different about Casino Royale. Instead of the artful silhouettes of nudes jumping around the screen, it was a brilliantly animated sequence that set me up for the action and themes of the movie. Plus, being a graphic designer myself, the artistry behind the credits was well worth the price of admission.

Daniel Craig (Munich, The Road To Perdition) was a brilliant choice as the new Bond. Though he’s handsome, he’s not the smooth, suave and debonair Bond that Pierce Brosnan was. Instead he’s rugged and visceral, like a cross between Steve McQueen and Mel Gibson.
Casino Royale is based on the first book in Ian Fleming’s James Bond series and shows us how he became a “Double-O” agent and how he handles his first “mission.” It’s great to see the studio restart the James Bond franchise like this. The changes aren’t as drastic as the way the Batman franchise was restarted with the movie Batman Begins, but I really liked how much more realistic everything seemed to me. Bond makes mistakes. He trusts too much. He’s reckless. He also gets hurt and has to convalesce for a while. It’s also nice to be shown by the events in this movie why he is emotionally detached and distrustful in future stories.
The action in Casino Royale was top notch. There wasn’t any fancy camera work to disguise poor stunt work or fight choreography but just straight-forward shots to let us be amazed by what they were doing and to enjoy the ride.

The filmmakers also do a great job at making a movie that’s essentially about a high-stakes card game, exciting. For a poker-ignoramus like myself, they're also able to explain the game enough for me to be interested in what happens next. I suppose that you could say that this movie was made to capitalize on all of the popularity poker is having right now, and I’m sure that’s true, but the card games were intermingled with enough intrigue and action that it never became dull or boring.
If you are concerned about the effects of gambling on teenagers, you might want to have them avoid this movie, otherwise I’d recommend it for anyone teen to adult who’s up for a good ride and a refreshing start to what was becoming a tired franchise.






5 Comments:
You know what made this movie great to me, was that they got back to Bond being Bond. It wasn't about the cars, the product endorsements, the fancy special effects. It was like the Bond movies of old. This is the first Bond film I have really liked in a long time. I think View to a Kill was the last one I liked. Maybe the last couple of Bond actors didn't do it for me, but this guy may be the best yet.
I love love LOVE this movie. I recently blogged about it (as I just bought the DVD and am already wearing it out). I completely agree in terms of why this movie is so good. It's gritty and more realistic. Daniel Craig is perfect and completely destroys the ultra-smooth phony Bonds of recent past. Two thumbs way up.
I was concerned about Nudity in this movie, I look at what it was rated PG-13 for and nudity was in there somewhere. I guess I'm asking should I be alright watching it?
Thank you, Dennis, for a truly spectacular review. I have not seen this movie because I'm usually a year or two behind. Btw, your review is being showcased as one of the best for Casino Royale on our Summize Blogger Review site here:
http://www.summize.com/product/casino-royale--widescreen-two-disc-special-edition-/b000mnp2ki
Howie,
Regarding your question about the nudity in this movie, I've come to the conclusion that most of the time when there's nudity in a PG-13 movie, it's male nudity from behind. In this case, it's Bond who's been stripped of his clothes and tied to a chair. I don't believe you ever see him from behind and you never see anything from the front. Just a side view.
Is that helpful?
Dennis
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home